Latest News

Tuesday, August 29, 2017

DevOps Delivers Faster Software Releases And Happier People

The most rewarding aspect of DevOps is the impact on individuals. To see people that are genuinely happy, and derive happiness from their work
First, the good news: DevOps is much more than a process change that speeds up software development and deployment. It invokes cultural change to the point where peoples' at-work personalities can actually change -- for the better.
Now the bad news: Moving forward with DevOps often requires a "trigger event" -- such as a merger or CEO change -- to motivate the organization to fully embrace such change.
These are the observations of Rob Englund, independent IT management consultant, trainer, and commentator, who has helped bring about DevOps within New Zealand's largest government organizations. Englund, recently interviewed by RunAsRadio's Richard Campbell, said gaining executive support for DevOps and related transformation can be challenging, but once underway, there is a "blossoming" effect.
IT leaders in and of themselves find it very hard to be the initial disruptors, Englund points out.."You may be in an exploratory phase, with people trying some Agile, and some new tools, but there has to be some sort of trigger event, or some sort of emergency," he relates. "Once you've got the trigger, then it's a lot easier to get executive support and the hearts and minds of people. It's got to be something such as, 'were going to split the organization in two,' or 'we've got a new CEO who wants to change everything.'"
Because organizations let their dysfunctions build up to a point where it takes a massive undertaking to set a new course, technology-driven transformation has to happen with a "big bang," Englund relates. In the case of one large government organization he was working with, transformation had to be all-encompassing to lift the entire enterprise out of its calcified state. "It was everything -- it was a cultural problem, it was an absence of automation, it was lots of siloed thinking and no sharing, it was no measurement and feedback."
The new CIO in this instance had to take bold steps, involving DevOps, to move the organization into the 21st century, Englund explains. "He had to take bold pushes to get started on the journey. He just decreed were going to start doing cadenced releases. Everything going out the door is integrated to the core trunk, and just goes out the door."
One of the things about Agile, Englund says, is "you're going to release on demand, there's going to be lots and lots of little releases flying out the door. This was the opposite -- everything had to be integrated together, and all going out the door within six weeks."
The challenge here was that "spaghettified, massive dependencies and entanglements defeated the theory of rapid deployment," he continues. Initially, the organization was able to move to a six-week cadence of releases "with no technology -- they had mostly manual environment builds, mostly manual testing." As the organization was able to get up to speed with automation and new tools, it was able to reduce its release cycles to four weeks. By the end of the year, the goal is every two weeks, he adds.
IT service and ITIL-based efforts have not delivered in the past because they are hinged on executed processes, rather than broader organizational and people transformation, Englund states. He says he has seen people transformed as a result of initiatives such as DevOps. "The biggest reward for me is watching people blossom. There are people who are oppressed by the system, and unreasonable systems create unreasonable people. If you fix the system, most people blossom and turn into a different person. Suddenly, they're happy and cooperative and creative. For me the most rewarding aspect of DevOps is the impact on individuals. To see people that are genuinely happy, and derive happiness from their work."

Source: Zdnet

Friday, August 18, 2017

What Makes An Internet Of Things (IoT) Platform Enterprise-Ready?

Answering the question of what makes an IoT platform scalable enough to excel in an enterprise needs to take into account application enablement, connectivity management, and data aggregation and storage. These and other insights are from a recent article by the Boston Consulting Group, Who Will Win The IoT Platform Wars? The report provides a useful framework for evaluating the enterprise readiness of the proliferating number of  IoT platforms available today.
The following key takeaways offer a glimpse into the IoT platform landscape and how enterprises can determine if IoT platforms of interest will be able to scale to their needs:
  • Enterprise software & services (22%) and IoT start-ups (32%) offer the largest amount of IoT platforms today. 18% of IoT platforms are being developed and sold by industrial technology providers who are looking to shift away from their hardware-centric business models. Superior design, extensibility, intuitive user experience and incentives for developers to support their IoT platforms are what’s need to excel in the enterprise. BCG found that 65% of enterprise buyers have a strong preference for purchasing their IoT platforms from enterprise software and services providers.
  • The real test of any vendor’s IoT platform is to see if it supports application enablement, data aggregation and storage, and connectivity management. Ideally, IoT platforms orchestrate applications, data, devices, systems, and processes providing business strategists with a scalable framework they can rely on to accomplish long-term goals. In reality the majority of IoT platforms today can’t provide this level of support to business strategies. BCG found that a scalable enterprise-ready IoT platform provides application enablement, data aggregation and storage, and connectivity management. The following graphic provides an overview of core IoT platform requirements.
Boston Consulting Group, Who Will Win The IoT Platform Wars?

  • Just 14% of IoT platforms are enterprise-ready. IoT pure-play companies/startups lead all providers of enterprise-wide IoT platforms today. Enterprise software & service providers are next at 36% of all platform providers meeting all three criterion. In the next three years, the pace of IoT pure-play companies/startup acquisitions is going to accelerate as enterprise software & service providers look to gain needed new technologies quickly.
Boston Consulting Group, Who Will Win The IoT Platform Wars?
  • IoT platform providers who earn developer loyalty have the best chance of dominating the market for years to come. Creating an open source IoT platform supported by a vibrant, growing community that excels at knowledge sharing is the most effective strategy for attracting developers. Additional criterion developers evaluate IoT platforms on are the potential to gain platform knowledge and improve their career prospects, and availability of high-quality APIs and available tools. The following graphic provides an analysis of what developers consider the most important criterion they consider when choosing an IoT platform to develop on. Enterprise software & service providers are using a variety of incentives including free training, certification, and the opportunity to earn cash bonuses for accelerating development and delivery of new applications on their platforms.






Source: https://www.forbes.com/

Thursday, August 3, 2017

Consumers Do Not Trust Innovation Technologies

Technological developments, such as artificial intelligence (AI), are being neglected over hacking concerns, despite it having the potential to change our lives.
A study carried out by IT and business change specialist, SQS, shows that the majority of the public is reluctant to buy into the latest tech products because of safety issues and malicious cyberattacks.
The study results found that 56% of survey participants are worried that their connected home apps could be hacked into; 40% believe break-ins would increase if connected home had a flaw; 80% looking to buy AI products said they might reconsider because of targeting by hackers; 52% think that home robots could fall victims to cyber criminals with malicious intentions and 48% claimed that they would not purchase AI technology at all due to cyber threats.
SQS’ CEO, Dik Vos, commented on the findings: “Emerging technologies should be embraced as early as possible if the UK is to gain an economic and technological advantage over countries who are willing to become early adopters. But for this to happen, the consumer trust issues that we have uncovered need to be addressed first.”
“Safety concerns and cyber vulnerabilities should be the top priority for companies developing innovative technology, rather than added as an afterthought or worse, once catastrophe has already struck. It is crucial that companies adopt a quality-first approach to gain the trust of the consumer. If advances such as AI, self-driving cars, home robots and connected houses are going to take off in the UK, stringent software testing and quality assurance must be carried out at every stage of product development to guarantee the safety of this technology,” he added.
SQS study concluded that emerging technology could severely affect the UK’s economic growth and to prevent this, businesses and organizations have a duty to prove to the public that every precaution has been taken to protect and safeguard technological developments and ‘human life’.


Tags

Recent Post