For the third time in as
many weeks, the IoT alarm system deployed in my home decided to go on the
fritz.
The first time, sensors
started to chirp annoyingly right after I had gotten the kids to bed. A simple
battery change seemed to resolve the problem. The second time it happened, I
was boarding a red eye flight from the west around 2 a.m. PDT, which left my
wife scrambling to find, lift, and use my extension ladder to silence the
devices before the noise woke the kids. Finally, tonight (does 3 a.m. count as
tonight or this morning?) the devices again went off—this time, allowing me to
realize that it was the same two culprits causing the problem. These three
late-night shenanigans led me to unveil five flaws that undoubtedly plague many
consumer IoT devices, which we should be avoiding as we are designing.
Mistake #1 – Not Automatically Setting Device Time and Using
It Wisely
An Internet-connected
system should be able to go out onto the Internet and retrieve the current
time. That time can easily then be sent to each sensor node in the network, so
that time is synchronized throughout the system. Time information can be useful
to determine whether it is an appropriate time to signal the user that there is
a problem with the system. For example, notifying a user with an annoying, loud
chirp that the battery is low probably is not something that should be done at
2 a.m. A few lines of code could easily defer sounding the alarm until 6:30
a.m. or, heaven forbid, some user configurable time.
Mistake #2 – Audible Alarms that Are Confusing
As part of my alarm
system, I have at least a dozen smoke and CO2 detectors that are located
throughout the house. In my late-night grogginess, I had narrowed the culprits
down to two CO2 detectors—one of which was located about 20 feet off the ground
in the living room, and the other which was thankfully within arm’s reach. When
these sensors went on the fritz, they started to chirp like a smoke detector
that needed to have its battery changed. The first time this happened, the
solution was to change the battery. The second time, since it was a different
troubleshooter, the solution was also to change the battery. The third time,
when both troubleshooters were there, we looked at each other and said, “But I
just changed those batteries!”
So what, then, is the
deal with that low-battery chirping noise? Enter Google. A quick late-night
search reveals that these detectors, when tripped, make the same noise as a
smoke detector that has a low battery. This makes me wonder: Two sensors both
tripped; is there a CO2 leak? Changing the battery cleared the alarms and they
have consistently gone off seven days apart within a few hours. Could it be
something else? Did I mention that these detectors are located right next to a
smoke detector?
As designers, we need to
make sure that the audible alarms our devices produce are distinct and easily
recognizable. Having a CO2 sensor that trips with a sound that is recognized as
a low battery indicator has some very serious potential safety consequences.
Mistake #3 – Not Tracking When Assets Need to Be Replaced
The CO2 detectors were
definitely the issue. After having to scale 20 feet in the air while half
asleep, I had the common sense to bring the sensor into the light and carefully
examine it. Swapping out batteries had cleared the alarm and one would hope that
if CO2 was really present, the devices would trip again. Since this didn’t seem
to be the case, and no one was more confused or loony than normal, a good bet
was that there was something wrong with this connected device.
Upon careful examination,
I discovered that there was a sticker inside the device located near the
battery that stated: “Replace by Feb 2018.” It’s currently October 23, 2018 at
around 4 a.m. Yes, I have sensors that are supposed to be monitoring and
protecting my home that are past their usable shelf life! The problem is that
the company that is supposed to be managing these devices has no clue that
their asset has expired and instead is waiting for system failures to occur
before they come out to replace them.
As designers and companies,
if there is a usable shelf life for our products or even for batteries that
need to be replaced, we need to track:
- When the device was manufactured
- When it was installed
- When it needs to be replaced
This allows service
technicians to be proactive in maintaining these devices in the field. If you
know that you are servicing client A, and client B needs to have their system
maintained in a month but you’ll be in the area, scheduling the two together
can dramatically save travel time and costs. This not only maximizes the number
of clients serviced, income, etc., but also keeps customers happy and, more
importantly, safe.
Mistake #4 – Not Assigning Understandable Location and Device
Information
What is interesting about
the system I have is that, despite a really cool application that I can use to
check the status of the system, the location and device information is sorely
lacking. For example, the sensors did report to the server that there was a
problem. Checking the application, though, revealed that sensor #18 in the
living room was having a problem. There are six sensors in the living room.
While our systems may be designed to be generic, for system users, we need to
make sure that we can assign human readable and accessible information, such as
“Sensor #18, Living Room CO2, Get the ladder.”
Mistake #5 – Reactive, not Proactive, Customer Service
As engineers, we probably
don’t give the customer experience much thought. That’s something that the
marketing and sales team should be worried about and can relay to us
developers. The fact, though, is that at the end of the day, the customer
experience is what will determine whether our company is successful. For that
reason, I believe customer service should be proactive. Despite my home system
being actively monitored, I did not hear a single peep. The alarms were
actually tamper alarms; shouldn’t that signal to someone that something isn’t
right?
At the end of the day, it
turned out that the CO2 detectors had actually expired and were triggering a
tamper detection signal. As I mentioned earlier, this was no different than the
CO2 detected alarm, which also matches a smoke detector's low-battery alarm.
When we design our connected world, we need to pull ourselves away from the
cool technology that we are building and look at the system through our
customers' eyes. How will they feel being woken up in the middle of the night?
Will they realize instinctively what that alarm means?
TMA Solutions was established in 1997 to provide quality software outsourcing services to leading companies worldwide. We are one of the largest software outsourcing companies in Vietnam with 2,400 engineers. Our engineering team was selected from a large pool of Vietnam IT resources; they are well-trained and have successfully completed many large and complex projects.
No comments:
Post a Comment